WBA Scores Analysis

« back

AMIR KHAN  vs   PAUL MALIGNAGGI  -   2010-05-15

CONSISTENT ROUNDS (Judges voted equal)

Register the consistent rounds to each boxer with the accumulated scoring
BOXERS NAMES ROUNDS TOTAL ROUNDS ACCUMULATED POINTS ADVANTAGE
Round numbers that won or drew each boxer in the three judges score cards Consistent In the consistent rounds Advantage in points for the boxer
AMIR KHAN 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10 100 10
PAUL MALIGNAGGI 0 90

INCONSISTENT ROUNDS (Judges scored different)

Number of the rounds that judges scored to the boxers and/or draw
ROUND No ROUND WON BY ROUND WON BY DRAW ROUNDS ACCUMULATED POINTS ADVANTAGE
KHAN MALIGNAGGI KHAN MALIGNAGGI
100 90

inconsistent

Judge A: GLENN FELDMAN 0%

Judge B: STEVE WEISFELD 0%

Judge C: TERRY O'CONNOR 0%


THEORICAL SCORE

AMIR KHAN 100

PAUL MALIGNAGGI 90

« back



Jorge Linares will dictate clinic in Medellin

Jorge Linares will dictate clinic in Medellin

The World Boxing Association (WBA) effort to grow Latino boxing...

Punches in the canvas

Punches in the canvas

Sometimes, when there is a legal knockdown, that impulse can...

Gervonta Davis recognized at Baltimore Ravens game

Gervonta Davis recognized at Baltimore Ravens game

World Boxing Association (WBA) Super World Super Featherweight Champion Gervonta...